ReviewCardiovascular therapeutics2026
Hotspots Evolution and Cutting-Edge Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis of Autophagy in Myocardial Infarction Studies From 2007 to 2025.
Review in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial infarction (MI), a severe cardiovascular disorder, has a well-established association with autophagy and disease progression. However, bibliometric analyses of this relationship remain limited.
methodsAll literature related to autophagy in MI published between 2007 and 2025 was collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and Scopus. The final database search was conducted on December 31, 2025. HistCite Pro, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, SCImago Graphica, and Origin were used for bibliometric analysis and visualization.
resultsThis search identified 649 publications on autophagy in MI. China was the most productive country, with Harbin Medical University as the leading institution. Researchers from Japan also made substantial contributions. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications published the highest number of articles. Sadoshima, Junichi was the most active researcher in this field. Current research hotspots include "oxidative stress" (the most recent focus) and "survival" (with the strongest citation bursts).
conclusionsThis bibliometric analysis synthesizes research trends in autophagy-related MI studies from 2007 to 2025. Future research should prioritize elucidating the mechanistic roles of autophagy in MI, particularly the interplay between mitophagy and the NLRP3 (NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing Protein 3) pathway, to facilitate the development of more effective clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.