Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42132987›Full record

ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2026

Why are Some Tissues More Vulnerable? Revisiting Tissue Specificity in Hereditary Cancer Syndromes.

Vanessa N Kozak, Jaqueline C Oliveira, Daniela F Gradia, Carolina Mathias, Enilze M S F Ribeiro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vanessa N KozakDepartment of Genetics, Postgraduate Program in Genetics, Federal University of Parana (UFPR), Centro Politecnico, Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics and Oncogenetics (LabCHO), Jardim das Americas, Curitiba, Parana, 81531-990, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3733-965X
Jaqueline C OliveiraDepartment of Genetics, Postgraduate Program in Genetics, Federal University of Parana (UFPR), Centro Politecnico, Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics and Oncogenetics (LabCHO), Jardim das Americas, Curitiba, Parana, 81531-990, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-3107
Daniela F GradiaDepartment of Genetics, Postgraduate Program in Genetics, Federal University of Parana (UFPR), Centro Politecnico, Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics and Oncogenetics (LabCHO), Jardim das Americas, Curitiba, Parana, 81531-990, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-5807
Carolina MathiasDepartment of Genetics, Postgraduate Program in Genetics, Federal University of Parana (UFPR), Centro Politecnico, Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics and Oncogenetics (LabCHO), Jardim das Americas, Curitiba, Parana, 81531-990, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3163-8600
Enilze M S F RibeiroDepartment of Genetics, Postgraduate Program in Genetics, Federal University of Parana (UFPR), Centro Politecnico, Laboratory of Human Cytogenetics and Oncogenetics (LabCHO), Jardim das Americas, Curitiba, Parana, 81531-990, Brazil. eribeiro@ufpr.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2194-4727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomic era revolution has significantly enhanced our understanding of hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes (HCPSs). However, despite the identification of pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes such as RB1, TP53, BRCA1, and BRCA2 and mismatch repair genes as the molecular explanations for familial clustering of specific cancer types, the biological basis behind the striking tissue preference for cancer development in these conditions remains unclear. Although the cancer spectra for each HCPS are widely recognized and routinely used to inform clinical strategies, most cancer predisposition genes are ubiquitously expressed and have DNA damage repair functions that would be expected to impact any tissue involved by loss (or gain, for oncogenes) of function. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature on the tissue specificity of HCPSs, integrating insights from molecular biology and epigenetics and discussing the evolving landscape of multi-omics. A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed (March 2023-September 2025) using predefined keywords related to tissue specificity and hereditary cancer, with additional screening of reference lists to identify relevant studies. While isolated mechanisms, including higher proliferation rates and organ-specific sequential patterns of mutation acquisition during carcinogenesis, have been proposed, the marked heterogeneity in tumor spectra across syndromes, together with their intrinsic complexity, suggest that no single mechanism is likely to fully explain tissue specificity. In support of this view, recent literature proposes that germline defects interact with the distinct epigenetic landscape of each cell type, which is inherently multifactorial. The epigenetic "hardwiring" prior to malignant transformation would include differential expression of genes that interact with the causal gene, and the presence of redundant compensatory pathways in unaffected organs. In parallel, the combined effects of inherited DNA repair defects and tissue-specific endogenous or exogenous genotoxic exposures, including hormone-mediated oxidative stress or ultraviolet radiation, further shape organ vulnerability. Experimental models reinforce the complexity, demonstrating that loss of tumor suppressor function is tolerated in certain cellular contexts but triggers cell death in others, suggesting that differential thresholds for genomic instability-induced apoptosis versus malignant transformation can delineate target tissues. Additionally, emerging evidence implicates microRNAs and regulatory variants in modifying cancer risk and organ tropism within hereditary syndromes. Collectively, the tissue specificity in HCPSs likely reflects the convergence of the germline defect with tissue-specific epigenetic architecture, regulatory networks, and environmental exposures, rather than a single causative mechanism. A better understanding of these factors could provide insights into tailored surveillance strategies and guide future research directions.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryEpigenesis, GeneticHumansOrgan Specificity

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.