Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133101›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Comparative neurologic toxicity profiles of chemotherapy versus immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Majd A Abualrob, Sami Alshehab, Yousef Awad, Ranim Toma, Tarneem Azzam, Rand Abdellatif, Ali Al-Salahat, Shahd Hamid

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Majd A AbualrobNeuroscience Institute, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar. majdaiabualrob72@gmail.com.
Sami AlshehabNeuroscience Institute, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Yousef AwadInternal Medicine, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Ranim TomaNeuroscience Institute, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Tarneem AzzamArab American University, Jenin, Palestine.
Rand AbdellatifPalestinian Ministry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine.
Ali Al-SalahatNeurology Department, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA.
Shahd HamidNeuroscience Institute, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed melanoma treatment, yet comparative real-world data characterizing ICI-associated neurologic adverse events against the well-established neurotoxicity profile of conventional chemotherapy remain limited. We sought to contextualize the neurologic risk landscape of ICIs relative to chemotherapy as a historical comparator, to inform treatment-specific supportive care and surveillance strategies.

methodsWe performed a propensity score-matched analysis using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, encompassing 162 healthcare organizations. Adult patients with melanoma receiving chemotherapy (dacarbazine, paclitaxel, carboplatin, or temozolomide; n = 9787) or ICI therapy (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or ipilimumab; n = 14,627) from January 2014 through November 2025 were identified. After 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching on 52 baseline covariates, 6887 pairs were analyzed over 1-1095 days post-index therapy. Primary outcomes were peripheral neuropathy, encephalopathy, and laboratory-anchored myositis (ICD-10 myositis codes with creatine kinase ≥ 500 U/L). Fractures served as a negative control. A pre-specified conservative sensitivity analysis excluded bidirectional treatment switching, restricted the ICI cohort to anti-PD-1 predominant exposure, tightened outcome definitions, and extended follow-up to 5 years.

resultsAmong 13,774 matched patients (mean age 67.1 years; 48.5% male), peripheral neuropathy occurred in 7.2% of chemotherapy-treated versus 3.2% of ICI-treated patients (HR 2.47; 95% CI 2.10-2.92). Encephalopathy occurred in 1.0% versus 1.4% (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.51-0.96). Laboratory-confirmed myositis occurred in 1.0% versus 2.1% (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.35-0.64). No cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome or CNS vasculitis were detected. The negative control showed no significant difference (P = .20). In the conservative sensitivity analysis (6640 matched pairs; 5-year follow-up), the peripheral neuropathy association was substantially strengthened (HR 5.45; 95% CI 4.16-7.15) and the laboratory-anchored myositis association was essentially unchanged (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.33-0.64), while the encephalopathy association attenuated to null (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.79-1.34).

conclusionsChemotherapy carries a substantially higher peripheral neuropathy risk, while ICI therapy confers elevated laboratory-confirmed myositis risk. These robust findings support treatment-specific neurologic surveillance and supportive care strategies in melanoma management, particularly neuropathy monitoring during chemotherapy and neuromuscular/CK surveillance during ICI therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaNeurotoxicity SyndromesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathyImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmune-related adverse eventsMelanomaMyositisReal-world evidenceSupportive cancer care

Identifiers

PMID42133101
PMCPMC13176077

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.