SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
The effects of computerized cognitive training on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe sought to quantify the effects of computerized cognitive training (CCT) on patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), to inform the development of clinical non-pharmacological intervention strategies.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases from 2007 to February 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CCT in patients with MCI. Outcomes including global cognition, specific cognitive domains, psychosocial functioning, and activities of daily living were analyzed separately by stata 18 and Review Manager 5.4.
resultsWe included 30 studies and 2056 participants. Our meta-analysis revealed that, compared with control conditions, CCT led to a significant moderate improvement in overall cognitive function, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.43-0.81; I
conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis shows CCT significantly improves global cognitive function in MCI patients, with stable benefits across subgroups. Despite clear overall effects, high heterogeneity, varying training protocols and assessment tools exist. Further large, long-term RCTs are needed to clarify CCT's long-term effects and support its standardized clinical application.
trial registrationPROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD420261328762; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261328762 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42133113What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.