Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133115›Full record

ReviewParasitology research2026

Parasitic isopods in fish aquaculture: A review of current knowledge and future perspectives.

Kerry A Hadfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kerry A HadfieldWater Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. kerry.malherbe@nwu.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-6360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquaculture has become a dominant contributor to global seafood production, providing essential protein and supporting livelihoods while alleviating pressure on wild fish stocks. However, cultured fish face numerous health challenges, including infestations by parasitic isopods, notably cymothoid and gnathiid species, which cause significant economic losses through reduced growth, compromised health, and mortality. Infestations are usually influenced by host factors, environmental conditions, parasite traits, and aquaculture management practices, including cage design, stocking density, water quality, and interactions with wild fish populations. Pathological effects range from tissue damage and anaemia to impaired growth, secondary infections, and mortality, particularly in juvenile fish. Effective management relies on integrated strategies combining preventive husbandry, environmental manipulation, biological control, selective breeding, and targeted chemical interventions, with an emphasis on reducing reinfection and limiting resistance development. Emerging approaches, including immunotherapy, gene editing, natural compounds, nanotechnology, and biosensors, show promise for sustainable control but remain largely experimental and require further validation. Future research should focus on life-cycle dynamics, host-parasite interactions, and eco-friendly interventions to improve prevention and management in intensive aquaculture systems. This review synthesises current knowledge on parasitic isopods in aquaculture, highlighting the need for integrated, ecologically informed strategies to safeguard fish health, ensure production sustainability, and mitigate economic losses.

Indexed as

AquacultureEctoparasitic InfestationsFish DiseasesFishesIsopodaAnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsControlCymothoidaeDriversEffectsGnathiidaeTreatment

Identifiers

PMID42133115
PMCPMC13364884

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.