ArticlePloS one2026
Precision public health: A natural experiment on chronic high-contrast PM2.5 exposure and pulmonary function among older adults.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a respiratory hazard, most studies lack the temporal depth to distinguish chronic from acute effects, particularly among vulnerable older adults. This natural experiment study employs with a 10-year stable residency filter. To our knowledge, it is among the first in Southeast Asia to evaluate the decadal impact of PM2.5 exposure on highly selected healthy older adults. Utilizing a Precision Public Health (PPH) framework, we provide regional evidence in Southeast Asia to integrate a quasi-longitudinal approach for isolating chronic respiratory effects using standardized lung function (GLI 2012 - z-scores, adjusted for Southeast Asian populations).
methodsWe conducted a natural experiment involving 101 non-smoking older adults (65-80 years; normal BMI) in Indonesia. This design compared populations with ≥10-year residency in contrasting environments: high-exposure urban (Kedoya) and low-exposure rural (Pangalengan). The decadal filter ensured temporal precedence. Spirometry included internal BTPS (Body Temperature, Ambient Pressure, Saturated with water vapor) compensation. Multivariable linear regression evaluated the association between exposure and Z-scores, adjusting for demographic and lifestyle covariates.
resultsHigh-exposure participants had significantly lower FEV1_z and FVC_z than the low-exposure group, with no significant difference in FEV1/FVC_z. Multivariable regression confirmed exposure group was the only independent predictor for FEV1_z (β = -1.42, p < 0.001) and FVC_z (β = -1.14, p < 0.001), after adjusting for covariates. These findings indicate a subclinical reduction in lung volumes consistent with a non-obstructive, restrictive spirometric pattern. Diagnostic testing indicated no violation of model assumptions was detected.
conclusionsHigh decadal PM2.5 exposure is associated with significant standardized lung volume reductions. The 10-year residency stability criterion enhances causal inference. These findings advocate PPH approach, highlight the importance of z-score-based spirometric screening for early detection of subclinical pollution-related lung function decline. Integrating environmental risk assessment into geriatric care and air quality management offers a cost-effective pathway to mitigate long-term healthcare burdens in megacities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.