ArticlePloS one2026
Evidence on strategies promoting discharge planning participation in patients with chronic heart failure: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic heart failure (CHF) poses a significant global healthcare burden. High readmission rates, driven by inadequate discharge preparation and suboptimal transitional care, underscore the need for effective discharge planning. Patient participation in discharge planning is essential for optimal outcomes, yet evidence on strategies promoting such participation remains fragmented.
aimTo systematically identify, map, and synthesize evidence on strategies promoting patient participation in discharge planning for adults with CHF, and to map the range of outcomes reported in relation to such strategies.
methodsFollowing JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we will search 20 databases (including PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese databases) from inception. Studies of any design addressing patient participation in discharge planning for adults (≥18 years) with CHF will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data on study characteristics, participation strategies, and reported outcomes. Data will be synthesized using a thematic synthesis methodology, with findings presented in tables, figures, and narrative format; the PAGER framework will guide the identification of patterns, advances, gaps, and evidence pertinent to clinical practice.
conclusionThis scoping review will systematically map evidence on strategies promoting patient participation in discharge planning for adults with CHF and describe reported outcomes. By identifying effective approaches and evidence-practice gaps, this review will inform clinical practice, policy development, and future research to enhance patient-centered discharge planning for this vulnerable population. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and stakeholder engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.