Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133940›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2026

Role of Technology Acceptance in the Telerehabilitation of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: Longitudinal Study.

Zsanett Tesch, Tamás Ujházi, István Kósa, Norbert Buzás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zsanett Tesch *Department of Health Economics, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4048-4801
Tamás Ujházi *Department of Health Economics, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-8071
István KósaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8805-4307
Norbert BuzásDepartment of Health Economics, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4496-8828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advent of telerehabilitation has created new opportunities for the care of patients with metabolic syndrome. In distant rehabilitation, technology acceptance is particularly important because home-based projects are based on digital devices, and many patients are less familiar with their use.

objectiveOur aim was to explore technology acceptance among patients undergoing a 3-month complex, telemedicine-supported metabolic rehabilitation. We were curious to see how different factors influence the intention to use rehabilitation technologies and how this changes through the telerehabilitation process.

methodsParticipants were selected from patients in the metabolic telerehabilitation program at the university. Our model was based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2, which we supplemented with various other constructs. A paper-pencil questionnaire survey was administered on the last day of the preparatory week of the rehabilitation program (T1, n=145) and at the follow-up visit after the closing (T2, n=139). We used structural equation modeling with the least squares method to explore the relationships between model variables. Respondent segments were also identified by performing a hierarchical cluster analysis using Ward's method.

resultsFacilitating conditions (FC) have the greatest impact (0.366) on the behavioral intention (BI) to use technology. Effort expectancy has no direct effect on BI; it operates only through performance expectancy (PE), which may be because, in telerehabilitation settings, patients are more goal-driven than experience-driven. The analyses of the T2 data show that the direct impact of social influence on BI has disappeared by the end of the rehabilitation process. This can be explained by the fact that during device use, it becomes clear that the devices are secure and the data are safe, making this factor implicit in the patient's behavior. Only 2 constructs appeared in both the T1 and T2 models: PE and FC. By comparing the 2 datasets, we have provided empirical support for an old hypothesis: the experience of using the tool for a time has led to a significant reduction in the impact of FC and a corresponding increase in the dominance of PE, which has "absorbed" the impact of some other constructs. Based on respondents' attitudes, we found 3 clusters. The telerehabilitation program itself has a significant impact on patients' BI, as the relative share of "enthusiastic users" (73/145, 50.3%) increased by about 20%, while the share of "distrustful reluctants" (25/145, 17.2%) decreased to a quarter by the end of the program.

conclusionsThis behavior-based functional approach enables treatments to be tailored to actual technology-use demands rather than to presumptive societal features. This means that before beginning rehabilitation, attempts should be undertaken to identify patients' clusters in clinical practice, and rehabilitation should be planned according to the individual's attitude toward technology.

Indexed as

metabolic syndromemodified UTAUT2patient behaviortechnology acceptancetelerehabilitationunified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2

Identifiers

PMID42133940
PMCPMC13219986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.