ArticleVox sanguinis2026
Portable radio-frequency identification device for batch identification and rapid verification of blood in emergency medical rescue.
Article in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesBlood is indispensable in emergency medical care and serves as mortality. However, in disaster zones and other challenging environments, batch identification and rapid allocation of blood supplies remain particularly difficult. A portable blood batch identification device (PBBID) based on ultra-high-frequency (UHF) radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology was developed to improve the efficiency of blood verification management in complex environments. MATERIALS AND
methodsPBBID has a lightweight foldable cabin and an integrated composite protective layer and UHF RFID antenna and is equipped with a dedicated blood management terminal. Its function, identification rate and accuracy were tested, and blood quality was assessed via blood count, biochemical analysis and haemolysis rate assay.
resultsFolded PBBID occupies 24.92% of the expanded volume, unfolding takes 23.68 ± 6.00 s and can identifying 40 blood units in 5.37 ± 0.48 s. During the storage period, fixed-frequency scanning did not significantly affect the quality of red blood cells. However, intensive scanning exceeding 300 times led to a notable increase in the haemolysis rate.
conclusionWith its foldable design, rapid batch identification capability and operational simplicity, PBBID markedly enhances the efficiency and accuracy of blood management in emergency medical rescue. Under conventional conditions, it does not compromise blood quality and can shorten the time required for transfusion and emergency treatment of patients with trauma, potentially establishing it as a valuable tool in pre-hospital and emergency medical rescue operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.