Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135404›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Brain tumor classification using fractional Laplacian image enhancement and vision transformer.

Jeean Darcus B, Surath Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeean Darcus BDepartment of Mathematics, SAS, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Kellambakkam, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600127, India.
Surath GhoshDepartment of Mathematics, SAS, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Kellambakkam, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600127, India. surath.ghosh@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis and successful treatment require accurate identification of brain tumors using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, MRI slices often exhibit low contrast, blurred boundaries, and noise, which can negatively affect automated classification performance. Traditional improvement processes can result in excess sharpening of edges or altered structural continuity, which could affect subsequent feature extraction. In this regard, a hybrid method combining fractional Laplacian-based image enhancement with vision transformer (ViT) is developed in two stages. The fractional Laplacian processing enhances the boundaries between structures and preserves structural continuity in the first stage. The second stage is the vision transformer (ViT), which captures local and global dependencies in order to do multi-class classification effectively. The structural similarity (SSIM) and the entropy are used to assess the frameworks by enhancement metrics, and the Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC are used to determine the classification performance. Experiments are carried out using more than one random seed and reported as mean as standard deviation and statistically tested. The highest configuration had a mean test accuracy of [Formula: see text] and the statistical test showed no significant difference between raw and enhanced inputs ([Formula: see text]). Competitive classification performance is shown to be achieved with experimental results under controlled multi-seed evaluation, and therefore, systematic analysis of the influence of fractional improvement on transformer-based classification models.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsHumansBrain tumorClassificationFractional LaplacianMRIVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID42135404
PMCPMC13369728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.