Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135442›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Direct and capacitive electrical stimulation shapes neural progenitor cell survival and orientation on conductive scaffolds.

Kelly W McConnell, Kamila J Thompson, Michael Spaid, Michael Paukshto, Haixia Dai, Zeba Firadous Shaik, Grace Jiang, Haya Bakdounes, Sepideh Kiani Shabestari, Paul M George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kelly W McConnell *Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kamila J Thompson *Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael SpaidConductivBio, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Michael PaukshtoFibralign Corp., Union City, CA, USA.
Haixia DaiConductivBio, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Zeba Firadous ShaikHoward University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Grace JiangDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Haya BakdounesDepartment of Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sepideh Kiani ShabestariDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Paul M GeorgeDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. pgeorge1@stanford.edu.

Funding

Stanford University Regional Coordinating Stroke Center for the NIH Stroke Trials NetworkU24NS107220 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MAARTEN G LANSBERG · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
A Conductive Polymer-Stem Cell System to Augment Endogenous Stroke Repair Mechanisms and Improve Functional Stroke RecoveryR01NS126761 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Paul George · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIH StrokeNet, United States U24NS107220-07NINDS NIH HHS NS126761NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS126761NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS107220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation (ES) of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) on conductive biomaterials offers a promising strategy to enhance regenerative therapies for neurological disorders. In this study, we designed and evaluated two ES platforms, direct and capacitively coupled, using silver nanowire-integrated collagen scaffolds to investigate their effects on NPC orientation and viability. Direct stimulation promoted NPC alignment along the electric field, suggesting enhanced guidance potential for neural repair. In contrast, the capacitively coupled system did not alter cell morphology but improved viability by 3.8-fold (cells parallel to the electric field) and 2.1-fold (perpendicular) relative to controls, highlighting a safer, non-contact method to support cell survival. Importantly, in vivo implantation of the conductive biomaterial in a rodent stroke model did not appear to elevate astrocytic activation, supporting its biocompatibility within an injury-compromised brain environment. These findings reveal distinct advantages of each stimulation modality, the preference of NPCs to be aligned parallel to the applied electric field in both systems, and underscore the therapeutic potential of tuning electrical environments for NPC support.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationNeural Stem CellsTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCells, CulturedCell SurvivalElectric ConductivityNanowiresRatsSilverBiocompatible MaterialsSilverBiomaterialsConductive polymer scaffoldsElectrical stimulationNeural progenitor cells (NPCs)

Identifiers

PMID42135442
PMCPMC13369720

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.