ArticleBMC cancer2026
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open approach surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors in unfavorable surgical locations.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe impact of postoperative and oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic (L) and open (O) surgical approaches for the resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (G-GISTs) located in surgically unfavorable regions remains controversial. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 699 patients who underwent primary resection of G-GISTs at surgically unfavorable locations across 14 centers in China between 2001 and 2017. The patients were categorized into L and O surgery groups. To reduce bias due to baseline differences, propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were employed. Postoperative recovery metrics and long-term oncologic outcomes were compared between the matched cohorts.
resultsAfter 1:1 PSM, the L group exhibited a significantly shorter and lower postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative estimated blood loss and postoperative complication rate compared to the O group (all P < .010). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing revealed no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) between the two groups (P = .190). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis further indicated that the L approach was not associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-3.60; P = .467).
conclusionLaparoscopic resection of G-GISTs located at surgically unfavorable sites was associated with improved short-term postoperative outcomes, including reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays and fewer complications, compared to open surgery, but had comparable long-term oncologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.