Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135686›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Full BLOOD count TRends for colorectal cAnCer deteCtion (BLOODTRACC): external validation of dynamic clinical prediction models for early detection of colorectal cancer in primary care.

Pradeep S Virdee, Jacqueline Birks, Tim Holt, Kym I E Snell, Gary Abel, Brian D Nicholson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pradeep S VirdeeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. pradeep.virdee@phc.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3006-8730
Jacqueline BirksOxford University Hospital NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Tim HoltNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Kym I E SnellDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gary AbelUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Brian D NicholsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

NIHR Policy Research Programme (Policy Research Unit on Cancer Awareness, Screening and Early Diagnosis PR-PRU-NIHR206132NIHR School for Primary Care Research C092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer has low survival rates when diagnosed late-stage. We previously developed sex-specific dynamic risk prediction models utilising trends in the full blood count (FBC), a blood test commonly performed in primary care, to support early detection. We aimed to externally validate these prediction models.

methodsWe performed a cohort study of patients with at least one haemoglobin, mean cell volume, and platelet test. Patients were aged at least 40 years at their current test and had no history of colorectal cancer. The models included age (years) at current test and simultaneous trends over historical tests measured over five years before the current test to inform two-year risk of colorectal cancer diagnosis. Performance measures included the c-statistic and calibration slope.

resultsWe included 2,956,977 males and 3,561,349 females, with 0.4% (n = 12,578) and 0.3% (n = 11,939) diagnosed with colorectal cancer, respectively. The c-statistic (95% CI) was 0.73 (0.72-0.73) for males and 0.74 (0.74-0.75) for females. The calibration slope (95% CI) was 0.92 (0.89-0.94) for males and 0.95 (0.93-0.98) for females. Calibration was good in subgroups of patient data, except under-predicted risk in those aged 70 + years, White individuals, and those with higher IMD. The c-statistic (95% CI) was similar regardless of the number of repeat tests used to define trend and increased as the longitudinal trend window increased until around 2.5-3.0 years for men (0.73 (0.71-0.74)) and 3.0-3.5 years for women (0.73 (0.72-0.75)) and decreased with increasing longitudinal windows thereafter.

conclusionUtilising temporal changes in the commonly performed FBC test could enhance risk stratification for colorectal cancer in primary care. Further research may highlight approaches for improving predictive performance further.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedBlood Cell CountFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareBlood testColorectal cancerFull blood countJoint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data.Prediction modelPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID42135686
PMCPMC13295383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.