Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135790›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026

Integrating stroboscopic visual perturbation into a neuromuscular warm-up in adolescent male basketball players: effects on cognitive function, physical performance, and postural stability-a randomized controlled trial.

Birgul Dingirdan Gultekinler, Serkan Uzlasir, Volga Bayrakcı Tunay

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07168681 (The Effects of Visual Input on Cognitive Function, Physical Performance, and Postural Stability in Adolescent Male Basketball Players), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07168681 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

The Effects of Visual Input on Cognitive Function, Physical Performance, and Postural Stability in Adolescent Male Basketball Players

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled36ConditionsSports Physical Therapy, Stroboscopic Visual Training, Cognitive Function, Physical PerformanceArmsControl group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Birgul Dingirdan GultekinlerDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey. birguldingirdan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-2348
Serkan UzlasirFaculty of Sport Sciences, Nevşehir Hacı Bektas Veli University, Nevsehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1436-8706
Volga Bayrakcı TunayDepartment of Sports Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0946-9484

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasketball is an open-skill sport that requires rapid processing of visual information and appropriate motor responses in dynamic environments. Stroboscopic visual training has been proposed as a method to increase perceptual-cognitive demands by intermittently restricting visual input.

methodsThis study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. A total of 40 male basketball players aged 14-18 years from two basketball clubs were included in the study (mean age: 15.35 ± 1.16 years; mean sports experience: 4.40 ± 1.87 years). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a basketball-specific neuromuscular warm-up program performed under stroboscopic visual perturbation on cognitive function, physical performance, and postural stability in adolescent male basketball players. Cognitive function was assessed using the CNS Vital Signs battery. Physical performance was evaluated using the Y-shaped agility test, the V-cut test, and countermovement jump performance. Static and dynamic postural stability were assessed using force-platform measures and the Y Balance Test. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA.

resultsSignificant time effects were observed for several outcomes, including cognitive function, jump performance, change-of-direction ability, reactive agility total time, and dynamic balance (p < 0.05). However, no significant group × time interactions were found for these variables. In contrast, significant interactions were found for the temporal subcomponents of reactive agility, specifically reaction time (p = 0.004) and decision-making time (p < 0.001), indicating greater improvements in the stroboscopic visual training group.

conclusionIntegrating stroboscopic visual perturbation into a neuromuscular warm-up program may selectively enhance the perceptual-cognitive components of reactive agility in adolescent male basketball players. However, it does not appear to provide additional benefits for overall cognitive performance, jump performance, change-of-direction ability, or postural stability. These findings suggest that stroboscopic visual perturbation may be a practical complementary training strategy targeting stimulus-driven perceptual-motor processes rather than global performance capacities. CLINICAL

trial registrationThis study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration Number: NCT07168681, Approval Date: 12/08/2025).

Indexed as

BasketballCognitive flexibilityExecutive functionStroboscopic visual trainingWarm-up exercise

Identifiers

PMID42135790
PMCPMC13326288

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.