ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Multi-omics insights into immune tolerance at the maternal-fetal interface in recurrent pregnancy loss: mechanisms, integration challenges, and translational perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Spleen-associated macrophage alterations and embryo viability in a murine model of recurrent spontaneous abortion.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a heterogeneous reproductive disorder in which dysregulation of maternal-fetal immune tolerance, aberrant decidual immune remodeling, and altered inflammasome signaling have been implicated within a complex multi-omics landscape. Multi-omics profiling (genomics, epigenomics, single-cell/spatial transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, microbiome analyses, and immunomics) is increasingly being used to characterize mechanistic heterogeneity in RPL and to support biomarker discovery and immune-informed stratification. Genomic studies have associated chromosomal abnormalities and pathogenic variants with early embryonic developmental failure, while epigenomic profiling has highlighted aberrant methylation patterns and imprinting disturbances. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics have revealed altered cellular composition and disrupted communication among decidual stromal cells, uterine natural killer (uNK) cells, macrophages, regulatory T cells (Treg), T helper 17 (Th17) cells, and trophoblast lineages. Proteomic and metabolomic studies have further identified immune-metabolic signatures associated with impaired trophoblast function and vascular remodeling, while emerging microbiome studies suggest a gut-reproductive axis that may modulate systemic immune homeostasis. Integration of multi-omics datasets with computational frameworks (e.g., weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA), and deep-learning models may improve RPL subtype classification, risk prediction, and the identification of potentially actionable pathways. However, current studies remain limited by small cohort sizes, especially in single-cell datasets, cross-platform heterogeneity, insufficient longitudinal validation, and a lack of multicenter reproducibility. Future work should prioritize standardized multi-omics pipelines, clearer evidence stratification, and immune-centric analytical frameworks to improve the robustness and translational relevance of RPL research. These advances may ultimately support immune-informed risk assessment and contribute to the gradual development of more individualized management strategies for RPL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.