Evidence mapPaperPMID 42136675Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

The therapeutic value of antidiabetic drugs in lung cancer treatment: from clinical evidence to possible mechanisms.

Qian Wang, Jiayi Xu, Qing Liu, Haixia Zhou, Yue Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian Wang *China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jiayi Xu *China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Qing LiuChina-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Haixia ZhouChina-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yue HuChina-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the steadily rising incidence of lung cancer and diabetes mellitus, both of them are increasingly becoming prominent global health concerns. Treatment options for lung cancer to improve prognosis and reduce the pain and financial burden of patients remain under continuous exploration. In recent years, hypoglycemic agents for diabetes mellitus have gained growing recognition for their potential anti-tumor effects through multi-pathway regulation, particularly in combination therapies, where they may enhance the efficacy of traditional chemotherapy or targeted treatments for lung cancers. Therefore, in-depth investigation into the effects of various hypoglycemic agents on lung cancer, along with their underlying mechanisms, is of great significance for developing more precise and effective treatment strategies, optimizing therapeutic outcomes, and improving patient survival rates. In the present review, we will summarize the recent progress of whether and how hypoglycemic agents could be potential complementary options for lung cancer treatment and explore the possible underlying mechanism. While examining the pharmacological profile of metformin relevant with lung cancer treatment, this review also explores the unique idiosyncrasies of other commonly used agents in diabetes mellitus management.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHypoglycemic AgentsLung NeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMetforminAntineoplastic AgentsHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminchemoradiotherapydiabetes mellitushypoglycemic drugsimmunotherapylung cancertargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID42136675
PMCPMC13168166

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.