ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Atrial fibrillation type-specific prediction of recurrence after catheter ablation: the pivotal role of right atrial remodeling revealed by explainable machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The high recurrence rate following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a significant clinical challenge. Existing prediction models are predominantly limited to left atrial parameters and often fail to distinguish between AF types, resulting in suboptimal predictive accuracy and clinical utility. This study aimed to develop distinct machine learning (ML) models for predicting recurrence in patients with paroxysmal AF (PaAF) and persistent AF (PeAF), with a specific focus on evaluating the predictive value of right atrial structural parameters. Furthermore, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques were employed to decipher the decision-making mechanisms of the models. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 297 patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for AF (230 in the PaAF group; 67 in the PeAF group). A total of 37 clinical and cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging features were collected. Following feature selection, eight ML algorithms were trained and evaluated. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was used to provide model interpretability, and a clinical decision support tool was developed. Results: The XGBoost and LightGBM models demonstrated superior predictive performance for PaAF [Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC): 0.831] and PeAF (AUC: 0.917), respectively. SHAP analysis identified the right atrial appendage (RAA) short diameter as the most important predictor for PaAF recurrence, whereas right atrial (RA) volume was the top contributor to predicting PeAF recurrence. Feature dependence plots further revealed complex nonlinear relationships and interaction effects. Conclusion: Machine learning models exhibited excellent performance in predicting post-ablation AF recurrence, with right atrial structural parameters emerging as key predictors. The explainable framework and clinical decision support tool developed in this study provide a new paradigm for precise prognosis assessment and personalized management following AF ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.