ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Implementation of a Pre-X-Ray Safety CHECK in Neonates.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radiographs are diagnostic tools used in neonatal medicine for diagnosis, reducing harm from vascular devices, and monitoring endotracheal tube placement. The lack of neonatal exposure guidelines and the repetition of radiographs due to poor quality have cumulative effects of radiation overexposure. This project aimed to improve the radiographic quality of films by 15% by using a standardized checklist before radiographic exposure, thus reducing repeat exposures. Methods: Radiographs were classified into 3 groups. The All-X-Ray Group consisted of all abdominal, baby gram, and chest films. Two subgroups included films with an indwelling device (peripherally inserted central catheter or an endotracheal tube). Data were compared from a Baseline Period through an Intervention Period and a Sustain Period (June-July 2022). Three sequential interventions were implemented: the implementation of a standardized safety check, increased unit presence, and hands-on simulation training. The primary outcome was a high-quality diagnostic film that met 4 predefined criteria. Measures were assessed using statistical process control methods through a time-series design to identify changes over time. Results: The quality of films in the All-X-Ray Group improved by 46% (19%-65%), whereas the quality of films in the peripherally inserted central catheter and endotracheal tube subgroups improved by 79% (2%-81%) and 73% (1%-74%), respectively. Conclusions: Standardization of the radiograph process led to improved quality of neonatal films in this unit. Consistent hands-on training enabled sustainable impact. Empowering bedside staff resulted in a positive culture change. A standard pre-x-ray checklist improved the diagnostic quality of films in a neonatal unit when combined with increased provider presence during the x-ray procedure and staff education.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.