Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137086›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Motivation, attention, and uncertainty: insights from animal and human research and implications for addiction.

Michelle Heck, Etienne Quertemont, Patrick Anselme

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle HeckPsychology & Neuroscience of Cognition-PsyNCog, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Etienne QuertemontPsychology & Neuroscience of Cognition-PsyNCog, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Patrick AnselmeDepartment of Biopsychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivational and attentional processes jointly determine how environmental cues influence behavior. Reward-predictive cues can acquire incentive salience, automatically capturing attention and eliciting approach responses even in the absence of deliberate intention, a phenomenon central to both adaptive behavior and certain forms of psychopathology. This review integrates animal and human evidence to examine how cue-triggered motivation and attention interact, and how these interactions are shaped by reward uncertainty, a dimension that has received limited interest in human research despite its robust effects in animals. Across species, uncertain or variably reinforced cues reliably intensify motivated behaviors. In animals, they enhance sign-tracking and promote persistent cue-directed responding, while in humans, paradigms such as uncertainty-modulated attentional capture (UMAC) show that uncertain cues exert a greater pull on attention, even when this impairs performance. We argue that these effects reflect an evolutionarily conserved mechanism that biases organisms toward exploration and information-seeking under unpredictable conditions. However, the same mechanisms can become maladaptive in modern environments, such as gambling or drug use, where artificially amplified reward signals can mimic or exaggerate the motivational impact of uncertainty, leading to compulsive cue attraction. By bridging motivational and attentional perspectives across animal and human research, this review offers a unified framework for understanding how reward cues gain motivational significance, how uncertainty modulates these processes, and why they may contribute to vulnerability in addiction-related behaviors.

Indexed as

addictionattentional captureincentive saliencemotivationrewarduncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42137086
PMCPMC13170461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.