ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Swimming expertise is associated with enhanced suprasecond visual duration discrimination across silent and rhythmic contexts.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Whether athlete advantages in temporal processing primarily reflect sport-specific temporal knowledge or transfer to neutral laboratory judgments remains unresolved. Competitive swimming offers a theoretically informative case because successful performance depends on the precise regulation of pace and rhythm across repeated actions in a sensory-constrained environment. The present study examined whether swimming expertise is associated with superior performance in a neutral visual suprasecond duration-discrimination task and whether any expertise-related advantage remains observable across sensory contexts. Methods: Two independent experiments were conducted, each including 20 Expert Swimmers and 20 Amateur Controls. Participants completed a visual two-alternative forced-choice duration-discrimination task in which task difficulty was manipulated by the between-interval duration difference (200, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 ms). Experiment 1 was administered under silent visual conditions, whereas Experiment 2 used the same visual task while presenting task-irrelevant rhythmic auditory stimulation concurrently with each visual interval. Accuracy and reaction time (RT) were analyzed separately within each experiment. Results: In both experiments, discrimination accuracy increased as task difficulty decreased, confirming the effectiveness of the difficulty manipulation. Across difficulty levels, Expert Swimmers showed higher accuracy than Amateur Controls under both silent and task-irrelevant rhythmic conditions. Evidence for a larger expert advantage under higher difficulty emerged in Experiment 1 but was not reproduced in Experiment 2. Reaction-time findings did not indicate a generalized speed advantage, although difficulty-related variation in response patterning was observed. The rhythmic auditory background did not materially alter the overall accuracy advantage shown by Expert Swimmers. Conclusion: Swimming expertise was associated with enhanced performance in a neutral visual suprasecond duration-discrimination task across two sensory contexts. These findings indicate that the observed advantage was expressed primarily in discrimination accuracy rather than generalized response speed and remained observable when the task was embedded in a task-irrelevant rhythmic context. More broadly, the results support a bounded-transfer interpretation: swimmer expertise appears to extend beyond overtly sport-specific temporal content, but the present evidence does not support claims of unrestricted domain-general timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.