ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Research and testing of a robot vision-based perception method for assessing corn sowing quality.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the low efficiency of manual inspection for corn sowing quality, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming, this study proposes an automatic seedling-stage plant-spacing measurement method based on three-dimensional machine vision. A high-clearance mobile platform equipped with a ZED 2i stereo camera and an industrial computer was developed to acquire RGB images and depth information of corn seedlings in the field in real time. Using the YOLOv11-Pose model, plant keypoints were detected and localized; combined with camera calibration and 3D reconstruction techniques, inter-plant distances were computed automatically. A sowing-quality evaluation framework was then established to enable automated analysis of the Quality of Feed Index (QFI), Multiple Index (MUL), Miss Index (MI), and coefficient of variation. Experimental results indicate that the system operates effectively under three preset plant spacings (15 cm, 20 cm, and 25 cm), achieving a keypoint-detection mAP@0.5 of 0.990 and an mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.989. In sowing-quality evaluation, the qualified indices produced by the system were 77.83%, 80.36%, and 82.46%, respectively, and the Quality of Feed Index (QFI), Multiple Index (MUL), Miss Index (MI), and coefficient of variation showed trends consistent with manual measurements. The proposed method enables efficient, nondestructive detection of seedling-stage plant spacing and sowing quality, providing reliable technical support for precision sowing and field management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.