ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Unmasking counterfeit semaglutide: analysis of real-world safety data from EudraVigilance.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The spread of counterfeit drugs represents a serious threat to public health because they may be ineffective or cause the onset of severe suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). To date, the traceability of semaglutide-based products, widely used off-label for weight loss, is not a well-studied area. Methods: The aim of this study was to perform a descriptive analysis to explore and describe the characteristics of safety cases related to potential counterfeit semaglutide products by using the European pharmacovigilance database EudraVigilance. Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) were retrieved over the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2025. Results: A total of 234 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) related to potential counterfeit semaglutide were retrieved from EudraVigilance, of which N = 172 (73.5%) were related to females and N = 83 (35.5%) to adult patients. A total of 89.3% of all suspected ADRs were serious. The most frequently reported suspected ADRs were "vomiting", "nausea", and "hypoglycemia". The analysis of disproportionality showed a higher reporting frequency of "hypoglycemia", "product use in unapproved indication", "malaise", and "drug ineffective" with potential counterfeit semaglutide compared to non-counterfeit semaglutide. Discussion: The present pharmacovigilance study showed a useful role in identifying potential counterfeit medicine suspected ADRs. Further studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.