Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137403›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Geographic Mobility of Urology Graduates From Residency to First Practice in the United States.

Mikhil Patel, Chakravarthy Nulu, Raag Patel, Sriharsha Sripadrao, Rohan Vuppala, Nikhil Jaganathan, Bradley Morganstern, Sherita King, Martha Terris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mikhil PatelDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4778-3316
Chakravarthy NuluDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Raag PatelDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Sriharsha SripadraoDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Rohan VuppalaDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Nikhil JaganathanDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Bradley MorgansternDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Sherita KingDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Martha TerrisDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Geographical mobility of Urologists plays a crucial role in shaping regional healthcare systems; however prior research often overlooks mobility patterns of Urology trainees. In comparing distances traveled during career transitions and initial practice locations in relation to residency training sites, we hope to address gaps in understanding how training environments and social factors influence professional trajectories and discrepancies in care. Methods: Data on U.S. Urology Residency Graduates (UGs) from 2020 to 2023 was obtained from ACGME-accredited residency programs in 2025. Authors utilized a website analysis to collect location and training data from January 2023 through September 2023. First attending positions were identified by students through residency program alumni pages, Google/LinkedIn, and when available, linked institutional physician profiles. Primary outcomes were regional retention rates, travel distances, and socioeconomic drivers (analyzed by multivariate regression) during transitions from medical school to residency (T1), residency to fellowship (T2), and residency to the first attending position (T3). Retention rates were stratified by NIH funding status (top 50 NIH-funded schools vs. non-top 50). Results: A total of 659 Urology graduates (UGs) were examined. The Northeast retained the most UGs during T1 but retained the lowest UGs during T2 and T3. The West retained the highest UGs during T2 and T3 and consistently retained over half of their UGs during each transition. More UGs from T50NIH travelled over 500 miles (39%) than NonT50NIH (36%) during T1. Additionally, UGs from T50NIH institutions demonstrated higher T3 mobility. UGs took attending offers in areas with predominantly Caucasian populations, lower minority populations, less physicians, and more rurality compared to their training locations. Conclusions: The heightened T2 mobility may be due to specialized training at select institutions, while lower T3 mobility highlights shifting priorities as UGs transition to long-term career establishment. Higher T3 mobility from T50NIH institutions suggest graduates from research intensive institutions were more willing to relocate farther distances for their first attending positions. Increased rurality during T3 was demonstrated compared to T1 and T2, which are centered around urban training environments. The findings highlight the importance of strategically aligning urology workforce distribution with regional healthcare needs.

Indexed as

fellowshipgeographic mobilityhealthcare accessibilityresidencytraining locationurologyurology graduates

Identifiers

PMID42137403
PMCPMC13167273

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.