Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42137529›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

The long-term psychological processing of an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in parents.

Maria Luisa Martino, Laura Vela, Michela Quitadamo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Luisa MartinoDepartment of Humanities, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Laura VelaDepartment of Humanities, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Michela QuitadamoNeuropsychomotor Rehabilitation Center Giffas, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A child's ASD diagnosis represents a critical event for parents, often requiring them to face the loss of their child's ideal image and reevaluate the family life projects. The aim of this study is to explore how parents retrospectively reconstruct and integrate their child's ASD diagnosis through autobiographical memories. Methods: 21 parents, 16 mothers and 5 fathers, that received the ASD diagnosis within five years, were administered the Reaction to Diagnosis Interview (RDI). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a two levels approach. The first one to explore the patterns of meanings that emerged in the whole parents' autobiographical memories through the Reflexive Thematic Analysis. The second one is to identify patterns of resolution or non-resolution of the impact of the diagnosis. Results: Findings show suffering and struggling as main themes and subthemes and a prevalence of unresolved diagnoses; gender differences in the way of managing the child-related care tasks, efforts, and coping strategies emerged. Discussion: In line with literature, our findings suggest that the availability of supportive resources plays a crucial role in facilitating parents' adjustment and integration of the ASD experience and harmonizing gender differences. They also emphasize that the impact of ASD diagnosis is not a single event but an ongoing process of meaning-making which changes with the child's developmental path. Our findings highlight the need for cognitive and emotional reconstruction and reframing of parents' autobiographical memories. These processes play a kay role in shaping how the diagnosis experience is integrated into one's narrative identity, creating opportunities for transforming the meaning of the remembered experience.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderautobiographical memoriesdiagnosisnarrativesprocessing

Identifiers

PMID42137529
PMCPMC13168189

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.