ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Sustainable taste: a conceptual integration of sensory, sociocultural, and structural dimensions for interdisciplinary research and practice.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the concept of taste in relation to sustainable food consumption, highlight disciplinary ambiguities in its meaning, and propose a refined definition that supports interdisciplinary dialogue and practical application. We ask: what do we mean by "taste," and how can it be conceptualized across disciplines to support a shared language for the sustainable food transition? To address this question, we conduct a conceptual analysis spanning sociology, anthropology, nutrition, consumer research, and sensory science. Based on this synthesis, we propose a definition of sustainable taste as a multidimensional construct encompassing sensory, emotional, and relational (SER) dimensions. The Sensory-Emotional-Relational (SER) framework conceptualizes taste not only as a physiological and hedonic experience, but also as a socially and contextually embedded phenomenon shaped through everyday food practices and sociocultural environments. To demonstrate its analytical utility, we integrate the SER framework with the COM-B model of behavior change (Michie et al. 2011). By embedding taste within Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation, we show how taste operates simultaneously as an individual-level sensory experience and as a product of social, material, and economic contexts that structure food choice. Reframing taste as a nexus of sensation, emotion, relation, and context provides a conceptual bridge between behavioral science and practice-oriented approaches to food consumption. This integration offers a foundation for designing interventions and policies that make sustainable diets both appealing and accessible across diverse sociocultural groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.