Evidence mapPaperPMID 42139269Full record

ReviewJournal of extracellular vesicles2026

Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles: New Hype or Hope to Explain Reproductive Host-Microbiota Interactions.

Hannah Wein, Paula Iglesias-Moreno, Apostol Apostolov, Andres Salumets, Damián O Muzzio, Alberto Sola-Leyva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah WeinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4360-3808
Paula Iglesias-MorenoDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6676-8537
Apostol ApostolovDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2507-5735
Andres SalumetsDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1251-8160
Damián O MuzzioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9963-8551
Alberto Sola-LeyvaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-1532

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MU 4404/3-1Estonian Ministry of Education and Research TK214Estonian Research Council PRG1076Estonian Research Council PSG1082HORIZON EUROPE Health 101120075Horizon Europe / Marie Skłodowska-Curie Staff Exchange 101236395Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF24OC0092384Vetenskapsrådet 2024-02530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advances in microbiome research are transforming our understanding of human health and disease, with growing focus on the female reproductive tract as a critical but understudied niche. Evidence for a local microbiome largely derives from bacterial nucleic acid detection; however, the biological relevance of these signals remains debated, with whether they reflect viable microbial communities, transient colonisation, or mere microbial remnants with immunomodulatory effects. Bacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs) have emerged as pivotal mediators of host-microbiota crosstalk. Their small size enables them to traverse tissue barriers, enter systemic circulation and access barrier-protected anatomical sites like the placenta, thereby extending their biological reach beyond the site of origin. Although BEVs have been extensively characterised in the context of gastrointestinal, respiratory and systemic diseases, their relevance within the reproductive tract remains insufficiently defined. Understanding whether BEVs contribute to processes such as endometrial receptivity, gamete interaction, embryo implantation and immune tolerance in early pregnancy may reveal novel mechanisms of reproductive physiology and pathology. Furthermore, unravelling the role of BEVs could help resolve the ongoing debate regarding the existence of a functional upper reproductive tract (URT) microbiota, reframing it in terms of microbial activity rather than microbial presence alone. This review synthesises the limited but growing body of evidence on BEVs in the reproductive tract, with a particular emphasis on their potential influence on female fertility and early pregnancy outcomes. We also outline the major methodological challenges, including the discrimination of BEVs from host-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), the technical limitations of current detection approaches and the risk of contamination in low-biomass environments that complicate research in this field. Finally, we highlight conceptual frameworks and future research directions needed to establish BEVs as important players in reproductive biology and to harness their diagnostic and therapeutic potential in reproductive medicine.

Indexed as

BacteriaExtracellular VesiclesGenitalia, FemaleHost Microbial InteractionsMicrobiotaReproductionAnimalsFemaleHumansPregnancybacterial extracellular vesiclesfertilitymicrobiomepostbioticspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42139269
PMCPMC13178799

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.