Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42139689›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

WhatsApp-Supported Teledentistry to Reinforce Oral Health Promotion Among Older Adults Residing in Rural and Urban Areas: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fernanda Muñoz-Sepúlveda, Víctor Beltrán, Alfredo von Marttens, Pablo Navarro, Claudia Acevedo, Rodrigo Mariño, Alejandra Chaparro, Leonardo López

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05917548 (Development and Pilot Implementation of an Oral Health Promotion Strategy Mediated by Teledentistry Focused on Community-dwelling Older Adults of the La Araucanía Region of Chile), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05917548 nacompletednot on this map

Development and Pilot Implementation of an Oral Health Promotion Strategy Mediated by Teledentistry Focused on Community-dwelling Older Adults of the La Araucanía Region of Chile

TypeinterventionalSponsorFernanda Muñoz SepúlvedaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled117ConditionsOral Health Knowledge, Oral Health Attitudes, Oral Health Self-efficacyArmsTeledentistry oral health promotion, Face-to-Face oral health promotion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fernanda Muñoz-SepúlvedaClinical Investigation and Dental Innovation Center (CIDIC), Dental School and Center for Translational Medicine (CEMT-BIOREN), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0009-0004-0771-3334
Víctor BeltránClinical Investigation and Dental Innovation Center (CIDIC), Dental School and Center for Translational Medicine (CEMT-BIOREN), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6046-821X
Alfredo von MarttensDepartment of Prosthodontics , Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-4457-6952
Pablo NavarroResearch Center for Dental Sciences (CICO), Dental School, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-5009
Claudia AcevedoClinical Investigation and Dental Innovation Center (CIDIC), Dental School and Center for Translational Medicine (CEMT-BIOREN), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-0088-9439
Rodrigo MariñoMelbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3061-843X
Alejandra ChaparroDepartment of Periodontology, Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Los Andes, Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-0791-7746
Leonardo LópezInformation and Communication Technology Institute, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7027-9893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to oral health promotion for older adults is globally limited, especially in rural, low- and middle-income settings. Digital research often lacks theoretical foundation and focuses primarily on younger cohorts, yielding few randomized trials evaluating accessible tools for oral health education in older adults.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a telehealth reinforcement strategy for oral health promotion to improve knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy in community-dwelling older adults.

methodsA single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 municipalities (2 urban and 2 rural) in La Araucanía, Chile. Eligible participants were functionally independent adults aged ≥60 years with smartphone and internet access; those with cognitive impairment, complete edentulism, or inability to use WhatsApp were excluded. Participants were recruited from regional databases and assessed using the Geriatric Dental Specialties Tele-platform, a teledentistry tool for older adults. Participants were randomized (1:1) to face-to-face instruction (comparator) or the same instruction plus 2 weeks of social cognitive theory-informed telehealth reinforcement (4 validated videos via WhatsApp). Clinicians and statistical advisors were blinded. Primary outcomes (oral health knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy) were measured via telephone-administered questionnaires at baseline and 6 weeks post intervention. Secondary outcomes included acceptability and self-reported behaviors. Analyses included hypothesis testing, multiple correspondence analysis, and k-means clustering.

resultsA total of 120 older adults were randomized (comparator: n=59; telehealth: n=61), with 103 analyzed (comparator: n=51; telehealth: n=52). Both groups showed substantial within-group improvements in oral health knowledge (comparator: Cohen d=0.93, 95% CI 0.52-1.34; P<.001; telehealth: Cohen d=1.07, 95% CI 0.66-1.48; P<.001) and self-efficacy (comparator: r=0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.74; P<.001; telehealth: r=0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.77; P<.001). In per-protocol analysis, telehealth improved dental caries knowledge (P=.03) and attitudes (P=.004), with no between-group differences in other domains (P>.05). In intention-to-treat analysis, telehealth showed a significant between-group difference for attitudes only (adjusted mean difference=0.91, 95% CI 0.34-1.48; P=.002), with no differences for overall oral health knowledge (P=.11) or self-efficacy (P=.59). Exploratory analyses indicated only the rural telehealth subgroup showed significant gains in attitudes (P=.003) and flossing (P<.001). Clustering suggested greater improvements among participants with higher baseline needs, predominantly rural, with fewer teeth. Telehealth demonstrated acceptability across multiple indicators (>80% for most measures) with no clinical adverse events; minor video-access issues occurred.

conclusionsTelehealth reinforcement provided significant advantages in oral health attitudes compared with face-to-face instruction. The intervention was acceptable and showed benefits among older adults with higher preventive needs, commonly seen in rural settings. By integrating theory-informed strategies into a familiar digital platform, this study adds evidence from rural and urban contexts, extending prior work on mobile oral health. It offers insights to address service gaps in underserved areas and highlights potential for feasible, context-aligned implementation. Future research should evaluate long-term effects, adaptability, and cost-effectiveness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05917548; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05917548.

Indexed as

DentistryHealth PromotionMobile ApplicationsOral HealthAgedChileDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineUrban Populatione-healthgeriatric dentistryhealth educationhealth inequitieshealth promotionhealthy agingm-oral healthsocial mediateledentistrytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42139689
PMCPMC13221623

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.