Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42140955›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

The role of fear learning in the development of psychosis: an EEG study utilizing a differential fear conditioning paradigm in people with psychotic vulnerability.

Metin Özyagcilar, Nilay Esin Ahrens-Demirdal, Anja Riesel, Tina B Lonsdorf, Tania M Lincoln

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Metin ÖzyagcilarClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. metinozyagcilar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3995-9160
Nilay Esin Ahrens-DemirdalClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1112-5463
Anja RieselClinical Psychology and Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Tina B LonsdorfBiological Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Tania M LincolnClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. tania.lincoln@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-2440

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 449640848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By studying how individuals in an "at-risk" state of psychosis learn about threat and safety cues - specifically, how they develop and unlearn fear responses to neutral cues - we might better understand the mechanisms leading to heightened arousal and fear that are characteristic of acute psychotic episodes. At-risk individuals (N = 88; of which 28 fulfilled ultra-high-risk criteria on the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States interview and 60 scored above a predefined threshold on the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences) and healthy controls (N = 44) underwent a standardized and validated differential fear conditioning paradigm including an acquisition, generalization, and extinction phase. The main outcomes of interest were the late positive potential, fear-potentiated startle, and self-reported ratings of valence, arousal, fear, and expectancy elicited by the conditioned stimuli (CS). The at-risk group exhibited diminished fear learning, evident in significantly reduced differentiation between the CS+ vs. CS- in the valence ratings compared to controls. Additionally, they demonstrated impaired fear extinction, evident in valence and arousal ratings, in which their CS differentiation showed a slower reduction than the controls. There were no group differences in late positive potential responses. At risk mental states appear to be associated with problems in distinguishing dangerous from safe stimuli and a diminished ability to adjust affective responses to conditioned stimuli based on new information, while the late-positive potential and fear-potentiated startle are unaltered. Early interventions could focus on recalibrating subjective emotional evaluations of fear-associated events.

Identifiers

PMID42140955
PMCPMC13179330

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.