ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2026
Comparative risk of pneumonia and acute exacerbation between P-CAB and PPI use in patients with COPD and GERD.
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are newer gastric acid suppressants used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but evidence regarding their respiratory safety compared with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains limited. We conducted a target trial emulation study using the Korean National Health Insurance database. Patients aged ≥40 years with COPD who initiated P-CAB or PPI for GERD between 2019 and 2022 were included. Follow-up continued from treatment initiation until the earliest occurrence of the outcome, treatment discontinuation, switching to another drug class, death, or the end of the study period. The outcome was the occurrence of pneumonia or moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations. Propensity score matching (1:3) was applied, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Among the 560,987 eligible patients, 4671 P-CAB users and 14,013 PPI users were included after matching. P-CAB was not significantly associated with the risk of respiratory events compared with PPI, but a trend toward lower risks for pneumonia (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.07) and severe exacerbations (aHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32-1.14) was observed. In patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤1, the risk of severe exacerbations was significantly lower (aHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.88). P-CABs showed lower risks of pneumonia and severe exacerbations compared with PPIs, although the differences were not statistically significant. Further long-term studies across diverse patient subgroups are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.