ArticleScientific reports2026
Ice-free vitrification of embryos and its impact on post-warming outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vitrification protocols are widely used for mammalian embryo cryopreservation. Post-warming outcomes are impaired by cryodamage from crystalline intracellular ice, whose formation depends on both the cooling and warming rates. Here, time-resolved X-ray diffraction measurements on bovine embryos indicated that current standard tools and protocols achieved ice-free cooling, but that intracellular ice always formed during warming. Increasing cooling rates by a factor of ~ 30 over current standard rates allowed ice-free cooling and warming, even when cryoprotectant concentrations were reduced by 30%. Embryos cooled at ultrafast rates exhibited survival and developmental competence rates close to those of unvitrified controls and significantly better than those cooled at standard rates. Increased global H3K9me3 intensity was found with both standard and ultrafast cooling relative to controls, while DNA methylation (5mC and 5hmC) was comparable for all groups. Transcriptomic analysis indicated adhesion and cell-junction assembly genes were downregulated while DNA damage repair pathway genes were upregulated with standard cooling relative to controls, and cell-development and differentiation pathway genes were downregulated with standard cooling relative to ultrafast cooling. Embryos vitrified with the ultrafast cool protocol retain full developmental potential and can establish successful pregnancies. Overall, increased cooling rates improved post-cryopreservation outcomes in part by minimizing ice formation, minimizing DNA damage, and preserving gene expression related to embryonic developmental functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.