ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2026
Cannabis Use and Clinical Outcomes in First Episode Psychosis: Results From a 2-Year Follow-Up Study.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction to 'Cannabis Use and Clinical Outcomes in First Episode Psychosis: Results From a 2-Year Follow-Up Study'.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to investigate the association between cannabis use prior to enrollment in a First Episode Psychosis (FEP) program and prognosis, including severity of psychiatric symptoms, type of antipsychotic treatment prescribed, and clinical recovery.
methodsA longitudinal cohort study was conducted on patients aged 18-35 diagnosed with affective and non-affective psychosis who were referred to the FEP Program in Ferrara, Italy, between 2012 and April 2024. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected at program entry and every six months for up to 24 months. Cannabis use was categorised dichotomously based on reported or charted use within the month prior to program entry. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS) was used to monitor clinical outcomes (assessed through reductions of the total HoNOS score, employment status, and type of antipsychotic prescription) and recovery (total HoNOS < 8). Bivariate analyses compared sociodemographic characteristics and clinical outcomes between people with cannabis use and people without cannabis use at baseline and at 1- and 2-year follow-ups, considering both baseline cannabis status and current cannabis use status. A Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, was used to compare the average HoNOS scores and the recovery rates between the two groups at several endpoints (baseline, 12 months and 24 months).
resultsThe total sample included 173 patients, predominantly men (74.5%), diagnosed with non-affective psychosis (83.8%), with a median age at onset of psychotic symptoms of 22.9 years. At admission, individuals reporting cannabis use (48%), compared to those without cannabis use, were predominantly male (87.9% vs. 62.2%, p < 0.001), had a significantly shorter duration of untreated psychosis (32.8 vs. 52.2 weeks, p = 0.05) and were more likely to receive combined oral and depot antipsychotic treatment (16.9% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.05), no difference in baseline HoNOS scores was observed. At 1- and 2-year follow-ups, no significant differences in overall psychopathology were found between groups under either cannabis use condition. However, baseline cannabis exposure was associated with lower rates of student status at both 1-year (11.8% vs. 24.3%) and 2-year (6.3% vs. 23.2%) follow-ups. At the 1-year follow-up, participants with cannabis use were more likely to receive a combination of long-acting injectable (LAI) and oral antipsychotics (21.1% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.05) compared to those without cannabis use. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of HoNOS scores or recovery rates at any time point (baseline, 12 months, 24 months).
conclusionsCannabis use prior to FEP program entry was not associated with significant differences in clinical outcomes or recovery, despite being admitted with a shorter DUP and being predominantly male. Nevertheless, cannabis use was associated with more intensive antipsychotic treatment, both at admission and at 1 year. These findings underscore the importance of early detection of cannabis use and integrated care addressing both psychiatric symptoms and substance use. Future randomised controlled trials should explore whether reducing cannabis use can decrease antipsychotic burden and improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.