ReviewGeroScience2026
Aging beyond diagnosis: the MRI brain age gap across disorders.
Review in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brain age gap (BAG), the difference between magnetic resonance imaging-predicted brain age and chronological age, is a proposed marker of neurobiological aging, yet its transdiagnostic significance remains uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluated BAG in Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD), schizophrenia (SCZ), stroke, and bipolar disorder (BD) to determine shared and disorder-specific patterns of accelerated brain aging. Sixty-five MRI-based studies were included. For each cohort, BAG was extracted or calculated, and standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were computed between patient and healthy control groups using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to assess the influence of age and disorder characteristics. Publication bias and heterogeneity were evaluated using Egger's test, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
42142219What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.