Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42142292›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co-Production Panel.

Luke Power, Dejla Hoxha, Lorna Caddick, Tong Xie, Hannah Coulstock, Alex Crocker, Katie Dryburgh, Daria Melashenko, Dacian Astilean-Style, Heather Bryson and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Luke PowerPsychology Department, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-5335-1258
Dejla HoxhaPsychology Department, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lorna CaddickDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tong XieFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hannah CoulstockPsychology Department, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alex CrockerPsychology Department, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Katie DryburghPsychology Department, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Daria MelashenkoPsychology Department, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-2308-123X
Dacian Astilean-StyleExpert by Experience, Member of the 'Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory' Group (MHIM-YPAG).
Heather BrysonExpert by Experience, Member of the 'Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory' Group (MHIM-YPAG).
Eva DrummondExpert by Experience, Member of the 'Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory' Group (MHIM-YPAG).
Sharon EhimenExpert by Experience, Member of the 'Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory' Group (MHIM-YPAG).
Poppy FairbairnExpert by Experience, Member of the 'Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory' Group (MHIM-YPAG).
Rowan KellyExpert by Experience, Member of the 'Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory' Group (MHIM-YPAG).
Paige SinclairExpert by Experience, Member of the 'Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory' Group (MHIM-YPAG).
Yu-Wen TanExpert by Experience, Member of the 'Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory' Group (MHIM-YPAG).
Aja MurrayPsychology Department, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 225364Z/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is growing recognition of the methodological benefits of co-producing adolescent mental health research. Co-production supports the development of study methodologies that are more relevant and appropriate for the examination of adolescents' mental health. Within this article, insights from the Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory Group (MHIM-YPAG) are presented in relation to which mental health constructs, predictive factors and measures were endorsed by young people for inclusion in a mental health study. The aim of this paper is to provide guidance to researchers, highlight the benefits of co-production and provide a template for co-production in mental health study measures.

methodsMembers (n = 18) took part in online 'focus group style' sessions covering constructs, predictive factors and measures related to adolescent mental health. They were asked to discuss and then individually rank a set of constructs, predictive factors and measures from most to least relevant. Following this, a semantic thematic analysis of session materials was performed by researchers and findings were verified by MHIM-YPAG members.

resultsMembers emphasised the importance of general and specific constructs that reflected both positive and negative traits. In addition, they emphasised the importance of examining suicidality/suicide-ideation. Social media, academic stress and relationships were the most relevant predictive factors for this group. Language use and response scale length were important when deciding measures appropriateness.

conclusionThis paper highlights the importance of involving young people as co-producers within adolescent mental health research. Benefits include improving the appropriateness and relevance of the study design. Insights may act as a guide for researchers involved in adolescent mental health research. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The 'MHIM-YPAG' was established to enable the involvement of young people to co-produce the MHIM project. Thus, this paper details the insights made by the MHIM-YPAG regarding the inclusion of specific mental health constructs, predictive factors and measures. As detailed in the MHIM-YPAG protocol paper, young people will be involved through the 5-year project in a co-production capacity.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdolescentFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID42142292
PMCPMC13179751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.