ArticleNature communications2026
Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aesthetic experience shapes behaviours ranging from everyday consumer choices to art appreciation. Although theoretical accounts propose that such experiences emerge from interactions among core brain systems, the dimensions organising this mental process remain unclear. Here, we introduce a data-driven framework to characterise the latent neural architecture of shared aesthetic evaluations. Participants viewed traditional paintings during 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and we applied dimensionality reduction to the similarity structure of their aesthetic ratings to identify the dominant axes of variation. Two principal dimensions emerged, visual semantics and hedonic valuation, each predicted by dissociable multivariate neural signatures. Category-selective regions along the ventral visual stream tracked variation in visual semantics, whereas medial prefrontal and subcortical circuitry tracked hedonic valuation. Moreover, individual differences in this latent aesthetic space, particularly within default mode network regions, scaled with visual art expertise. Together, these findings reveal how core brain systems synergistically organise shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.