Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143095›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing spectral analysis of ghee adulteration via a deep learning-based multimodal attention mechanism.

Aditya Upadhyay, Neha Chaudhary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aditya UpadhyayManipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. aditya.upadhyay@jaipur.manipal.edu.
Neha ChaudharyManipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expensive dairy products like ghee are at high risk of hazardous adulteration with cheaper fats, and traditional testing approaches such as FTIR device and conventional machine learning are too slow, complex, and lack the interpretability to be useful for practical food safety. To address this, we propose a new deep learning framework which is robust and highly interpretable. Our solution is a multimodal attention-based architecture that integrates optimized machine learning classifiers with advanced deep models, including these phases Phase I: Feature Extraction by help of Machine Learning Models (e.g. SVM, XGBoost, Random Forest), Phase II: Extracted Feature converted to spectroscopy, Phase III: an Attention-Augmented 1D-CNN and a Transformer-based network. Importantly, we introduced a Spectral Attention Map (SAM) mechanism that automatically focuses the chemically relevant FTIR bands, ensuring the completely transparent model's high-accuracy decisions beyond the "black-box". The reliability can be enhanced using a Dynamic Multimodal Fusion scheme that learns to assigns weights to the outputs of all models adaptively. Our system was evaluated on a statistically enriched, custom FTIR dataset with various different attributes of ghee on the basis of which we create the spectroscopy of the respective attributes and achieved a staggering classification accuracy of 99.6% with a 94% feature dimensionality reduction, showing the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach. This work establishes a new benchmark for food authentication using AI, offering a highly accurate, scalable and transparent solution with significant potential to be incorporated into a real-time and portable food safety systems to allow on-site verification.

Indexed as

Dynamic fusion mechanismFTIR spectroscopyGhee adulteration detectionMultimodal attentionSpectral attention maps

Identifiers

PMID42143095
PMCPMC13377215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.