ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning strategies for estimating retinal thickness from fundus images: a comparative study with multi-device data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Color fundus photographs (CFPs) are widely used for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening due to accessibility. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides complementary depth-resolved retinal structure information but is less practical for large-scale screening, especially due to its cost. This study presents a deep learning framework based on a foundation model (FM) to estimate OCT-derived total retinal thickness (TRT) maps directly from CFPs, without preprocessing steps such as region registration. RETFound was used as the backbone FM, and the AI-READI dataset with paired CFPs and OCT scans from two devices (Topcon Maestro2 and Triton) was used for training and evaluation. Additional training data came from OCTA-500 and EyePACS. Three decoder training strategies for TRT estimation were compared: Individual, Combination, and Random Selection. Device-derived OCT TRT maps showed a significant inter-device thickness difference, with Maestro2 measuring on average more than 30 µm thicker than Triton. Individual and Combination models achieved low bias (relative difference about 5%) against device-specific references. The Random Selection model converged toward the average TRT distribution between Maestro2 and Triton, demonstrating robustness to device variability. The proposed FM-based framework bridges CFP and OCT by estimating retinal thickness from CFPs without OCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.