Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42144643›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2026

Perceptions of information and participation in child and adolescent mental health care: a comparison of patient and caregiver reports across inpatient and day hospital settings.

Daria Nolkemper, Dirk Lubbe, Ferdinand Keller, Bettina K Doering, Stefanie Bienioschek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daria NolkemperBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany. Daria.Nolkemper@mhb-fontane.de.
Dirk LubbeBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany.
Ferdinand KellerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Bettina K DoeringDepartment of Psychology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Stefanie BienioschekBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS), the principles of information provision and participatory decision-making have gained prominence, reflecting both legal mandates and ethical standards. Within the last few years, the number of day hospital treatment programs has increased and political decisions led to a reduction in inpatient beds. Given the structural and procedural differences between the treatment settings, this study examines whether patients' and caregivers' ratings of information and participation differ between an inpatient treatment and a day hospital treatment.

methodPatients and caregivers answered the "Broad Evaluation of Satisfaction with Treatment" (BEST) questionnaire before discharge from inpatient or day hospital treatment. Two exploratory new subscales were pragmatically composed from existing items in the BEST: An information and a participation subscale. Data from 127 children, 93 caregivers, and 136 adolescents regarding their perception of information provision and participation were analyzed to examine potential differences between the settings.

resultsChildren and caregivers rated information provision and participation equally high in both treatment settings. Adolescents, however, reported higher satisfaction with information provision during day hospital treatment compared to inpatient treatment. Gender and diagnosis affected the evaluations of participation within the adolescent sample. In the child sample, gender had an effect on the ratings of participation. The subscales Information and Participation show good reliabilities in the adolescent and in the caregiver samples, whereas within the child sample, only the participation subscale shows sufficiently good psychometric properties.

conclusionDespite structural and conceptual differences between the settings, there are no significant differences in the perception of participation. Adolescents in the day hospital, however, reported higher satisfaction with information than adolescents in inpatient treatment. One possible explanation could be a participatory treatment planning tool that is used in the day hospital for adolescents. This tool addresses the item "Goals of treatment discussed" which is located in the information subscale. The subscales of the BEST questionnaire, particularly those related to information and participation, may be helpful in highlighting and fostering person-centered care, especially for adolescents.

Indexed as

Child and adolescent psychiatryDay hospital treatmentInformationInpatient treatmentParticipationPerson-centered careTreatment satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42144643
PMCPMC13196158

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.