Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145491›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026

Can machine learning predict non-suicidal self-injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qianhui Wen, Rong Luo, Qian Wang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qianhui WenDepartment of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Rong LuoDepartment of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qian WangDepartment of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is common among adolescents and young adults and remains difficult to detect early using conventional approaches. machine learning (ML) has increasingly been applied to develop prediction models for NSSI. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that developed ML models for NSSI prediction, as defined by the original study authors. Multiple databases were searched from inception to June 28, 2025. Model performance, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity, was synthesized using a bivariate random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST+AI. Results: Twelve studies involving 33,366 participants were included. In the primary model-level analysis, ensemble models showed relatively favorable pooled discrimination, with a pooled AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79-0.86), sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85), and specificity of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.84). Single models showed lower performance (AUC: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.64-0.72). Only one study evaluated a deep learning (DL) model (AUC = 0.70), and this estimate should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Across all 19 models, the pooled AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, and the apparent advantage of ensemble models was not sustained in the study-level sensitivity analysis. Most studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in the analysis domain. Conclusions: ML models show promise for identifying NSSI-related risk, but current evidence supporting true prospective prediction remains limited. The evidence base is constrained by substantial heterogeneity, a high risk of bias, and the predominance of cross-sectional studies. Prospective multicenter studies with external validation and standardized reporting are needed before ML-based models can be translated into clinical or public health practice. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251075613, identifier: CRD420251075613.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSelf-Injurious BehaviorHumansPredictive Learning Modelsdeep learningmachine learningmeta-analysisnon-suicidal self-injurysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42145491
PMCPMC13173908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.