ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Stray light analysis and suppression of an ultra-high-magnification zoom endoscopy.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-high-magnification zoom electronic endoscopes are highly susceptible to stray light because compact optomechanical layouts and zoom-dependent optical reconfiguration strongly affect non-imaging light propagation. In compact systems with a small-aperture moving lens group, indiscriminate barrel blackening is not always desirable because coating degradation or peeling may compromise imaging reliability. This study presents a simulation-guided, state-dependent stray light analysis and suppression strategy for a compact ultra-high-magnification zoom endoscope. Monte Carlo ray tracing was performed at different zoom positions to identify the dominant stray light paths in the conventional, low-magnification, and high-magnification modes. The results show that the dominant sources vary significantly with zoom state; as the system moves toward near-focus and high-magnification operation, changes in group position, back focal distance, and ray geometry increase interaction with critical surfaces, leading to stronger ghosting and background stray light. Based on this analysis, targeted suppression measures were implemented at the corresponding critical locations, including reflectance optimization of key optical interfaces, selective blackening of lens edges and mechanical surfaces, and local baffling. Both simulation and experiment confirm that the proposed strategy effectively suppresses ghost artifacts and background stray light while improving image contrast, luminance uniformity, and detail visibility, especially in the high-magnification mode. This work provides a practical framework for state-dependent stray light control in compact ultra-high-magnification zoom endoscopes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.