Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145770›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026

Toxicity reduction and immune reconstitution with adjuvant traditional Chinese medicine for postoperative ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuyang Mi, Yan Wang, Qian Liu, Li Huang, Maoya Li, Min Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuyang MiChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yan WangGynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Qian LiuPengzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Pengzhou, China.
Li HuangGynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Maoya LiGynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Min LiuGynecology Department, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) as an adjunctive modality in postoperative ovarian cancer management, specifically focusing on its capacity for toxicity reduction and immune reconstitution. Methods: Literature was systematically searched across six databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, SinoMed, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library.) for literature published between January 2018 and June 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared integrative therapy (TCM plus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy) to conventional therapy alone in postoperative patients with ovarian cancer. The primary endpoint was the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs), while secondary endpoints included immune cell subsets (CD3 Results: Twenty-two RCTs ( Conclusion: The integration of TCM with postoperative chemotherapy provided dual benefit of reducing treatment toxicity and enhancing cellular immune recovery in patients with ovarian cancer. Due to limitations in study quality and heterogeneity, further high-quality RCTs are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized TCM protocols. Systematci review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251242407, CRD420251242407.

Indexed as

chemotherapy toxicityintegrative oncologymeta-analysisovarian cancertraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID42145770
PMCPMC13171591

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.