ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Non-invasive prediction of detrusor underactivity in benign prostatic hyperplasia: an interpretable machine learning framework to optimize surgical selection.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and internally validate an interpretable, non-invasive machine learning framework to predict detrusor underactivity (DU) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 538 urodynamically evaluated BPH patients. A rigorous multidimensional feature selection pipeline (LASSO, Boruta, and Recursive Feature Elimination) distilled 15 baseline clinical, anatomical, and uroflowmetry parameters into a parsimonious five-feature subset. Five supervised machine learning algorithms were trained and systematically compared. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was integrated for global and local interpretability. Results: The optimized XGBoost model demonstrated superior discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.958), significantly outperforming traditional multivariable logistic regression (AUC = 0.787). XGBoost consistently exhibited superior calibration and higher net clinical benefit across varied threshold probabilities. Crucially, SHAP global dependence plots revealed non-linear pathological trajectories, notably demonstrating a U-shaped risk profile for bladder wall thickness (BWT) that was not captured by classical linear statistical detection. Local SHAP visualizations effectively translated complex probabilistic outputs into individualized clinical reasoning. Conclusion: The interpretable XGBoost framework serves as a robust non-invasive risk stratification tool for DU, decoding complex non-linear clinical interactions. This algorithm holds significant potential to optimize preoperative patient selection and mitigate surgical failures in borderline clinical scenarios. Clinical trial registration: Identifier 2026-048.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.