ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Real-time AI integration for MR to detect artifacts and guide pulse sequence adaptations.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To present a first-of-its-kind artificial intelligence (AI-)integrated MR pulse sequence that detects out-of-voxel (OOV) artifacts in real-time (within-TR) and responds prospectively by updating the crusher gradient scheme. Methods: Per Excitation Real-time Execution & Guided Responses with Integrated Neural-network Evaluation (PEREGRINE), developed for deployment of deep learning models and sequence updates, operated time-domain (TD) and frequency-domain (FD) convolutional autoencoders that detect OOV artifacts. Scans without (AI-off) and with (AI-on) updates were collected from the prefrontal cortex of healthy volunteers using edited MRS. The degree of OOV contamination (OOV score) was quantified per transient based upon the prevalence of OOV signals in the TD and FD data. OOV scores above a user-defined threshold triggered an update of the gradient scheme, iterating through 48 permutations (6 axis transpositions × 8 polarity flips). Results: Within each 2-second TR, PEREGRINE successfully provided single-transient OOV scores and updated gradients accordingly. No difference was observed between the OOV scores from the full ("Full" condition) AI-on and AI-off sessions due to the AI-on scan cycling over better and worse gradient permutations relative to the AI-off scan. However, the AI-on scan had significantly lower OOV scores than the AI-off scan when selecting the transients where PEREGRINE persisted ("Dwell" condition) on a given gradient permutation. Ultimately, Fit Quality Number (FQN), from linear combination modeling, improved significantly for the AI-on compared to the AI-off scan. Conclusion: PEREGRINE enabled an AI-integrated sequence allowing for real-time evaluation and reduction of OOV artifacts, identifying gradient modifications that produced less OOV contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.