ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Telemedicine for new immigrant children in the US: a tool for equity or another layer of disparity?
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine refers to the use of digital communication tools to deliver healthcare services. In pediatrics care in the United States (US), it has become an important approach to expand access to primary and subspecialty care while reducing travel demands and improving continuity of care, particularly for children in remote and underserved communities. Evidence consistently shows that telemedicine can supplement in-person visits while maintaining high levels of family satisfaction and clinical effectiveness among American families. This narrative review was developed to assess the applicability of telemedicine for new immigrant families in the US using a structured literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane of published English literature. Peer-reviewed studies were included if they were conducted in the last 50 years and focused on pediatric patients from birth to 21 years of age. Findings were synthesized to evaluate the acceptance, accessibility, feasibility, and applicability of telemedicine for new immigrant children in the US. Across the reviewed literature, telemedicine has meaningful potential in narrowing health disparities faced by new immigrant families such as transportation, specialist shortages, scheduling delays, limited English proficiency, and difficulty navigating the complex healthcare system. Furthermore, telemedicine can connect families with providers who share similar cultural and linguistic backgrounds, thereby strengthening cultural sensitivity and trust. Still, it comes with several obstacles limiting its use among new immigrant families. From digital divide, poor network coverage, low health literacy, privacy concerns, immigration-related concerns, to mistrust, the challenges are numerous. Studies during the COVID-19 pandemic found low acceptance and infeasibility of telemedicine for new immigrant families. However, telemedicine offers multiple opportunities and future directions to better serve immigrant children and their families. Expanding multilingual telehealth platforms and integrating telemedicine access points into schools, community centers, and immigrant resource hubs can enhance accessibility, usability, and acceptance. Pairing telemedicine with artificial intelligence can have huge future potential and might be a tool for inclusive care at lower cost. Furthermore, policy amendments, particularly broader Medicaid telemedicine coverage and mandates for interpreter integration into telemedicine workflows, are essential for promoting more equitable access with higher acceptance and more applicability for new immigrant children in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.