ArticleResearch square2026
Galactic cosmic radiation produces sex-specific, circuit-selective cognitive vulnerability: countermeasure trade-offs revealed by multi-domain assessment.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Astronauts on deep space missions face chronic exposure to galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). However, it remains unknown whether mission-relevant multi-ion GCR produces global or circuit-selective cognitive vulnerabilities and whether candidate countermeasures protect uniformly or show domain-dependent trade-offs. Here we used a 33-ion GCR simulation with concurrent countermeasure treatment to address both questions in male and female mice. C57BL/6J mice received 33-GCR (0.75 Gy) or sham radiation with the Nrf2-activating compound CDDO-EA or vehicle, followed by multi-domain behavioral assessment across the hippocampal-nucleus accumbens-prefrontal circuit. Under very high memory load, male Veh/33-GCR mice showed enhanced pattern separation compared to Veh/Sham males, an effect normalized by CDDO-EA. Female mice showed no radiation-induced changes in pattern separation but weighed more than Veh/Sham females and had reduced locomotor activity. Reward-based learning differed by sex: males showed no changes, while female Veh/33-GCR mice displayed enhanced reward anticipation, with both treatments contributing to elevated goal-tracking. For behavioral flexibility, CDDO-EA impaired reversal learning in males regardless of radiation, while 33-GCR impaired reversal learning in females regardless of CDDO-EA. Principal component analysis revealed CDDO-EA under 33-GCR specifically disrupted the balance between stimulus-driven and executive control processes and altered goal-directed behavior, while hippocampal-dependent discrimination maintained its functional relationships with other cognitive domains - confirming circuit-selective rather than global vulnerability. In a preliminary fiber photometry cohort, irradiated males showed enhanced dentate gyrus encoding activity under high memory load. At the cellular level, combined CDDO-EA/33-GCR selectively reduced dentate gyrus progenitors in females. Together, these findings reveal distinct, circuit-selective vulnerability patterns in males and females that would have been invisible to single-sex, single-endpoint designs. CDDO-EA proved a double-edged sword: protecting one cognitive domain while impairing another, a trade-off invisible to single-endpoint assessment and directly relevant to astronaut risk assessment.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.