ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Agronomic biofortification in tomato: balancing micronutrient enrichment, yield, and fruit quality.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Micronutrient fertilisation is a promising strategy for agronomic biofortification of tomatoes. Yet, its effects on yield formation and fruit quality remain insufficiently clarified, particularly when multiple nutrients and application methods are considered simultaneously. Methods: This study evaluated a range of fertilisation treatments differing in application method (soil, foliar, and combined) and dose, assessing their effects on fruit mineral composition (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu), yield components, and quality traits, including physicochemical properties, antioxidant capacity, and an integrated quality score (IQS). Results: Fertilisation significantly affected fruit mineral composition, with the strongest enrichment observed for Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu. The highest micronutrient concentrations were recorded at the highest soil application rate (5%), but this treatment caused a substantial yield reduction. In contrast, moderate treatments, particularly 1% soil and 0.1% foliar + 0.5% soil application, achieved significant mineral enrichment while maintaining stable productivity. Yield variation was primarily driven by changes in fruit number rather than fruit weight. Fruit quality traits responded strongly to fertilisation, with higher doses enhancing antioxidant capacity and moderate treatments improving taste balance. The highest IQS was obtained under a combined moderate treatment (0.5% foliar + 1% soil). Principal component analysis revealed a partial trade-off between mineral enrichment and yield, while identifying treatments with balanced performance across mineral composition, productivity, and quality. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that effective agronomic biofortification of tomato fruits can be achieved through moderate, well-optimised fertilisation strategies. Such approaches enhance micronutrient content without compromising yield or overall fruit quality, providing a practical framework for sustainable improvement of the nutritional value of horticultural crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.