SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Comparative efficacy of pediatric atopic dermatitis treatments: a network meta-analysis highlighting dupilumab and pimecrolimus for SCORAD and EASI improvement.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atopic Dermatitis (AD) in children is a common chronic skin condition characterized by dry, itchy and inflamed skin. Various treatments have been applied in the management of AD in children, but the differences in efficacy of different treatment options have not been systematically summarized. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different treatments for atopic dermatitis in children by network meta-analysis. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search to select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria. Databases included PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with a March 10, 2025, search deadline. Certainty of evidence was graded using the CINeMA tool, and risk of bias was assessed using risk of bias 2.0. The efficacy of different treatment regimens was compared using Bayesian network meta-analysis with R software. The primary outcome indicators were the SCORAD (Clinical Score for Atopic Dermatitis) and EASI (Atopic Dermatitis Area and Severity Index) scores. Results: Thirty-two randomized controlled trials (n=3961) were included. Meta-analysis showed Dupilumab was more effective than Melatonin, Probiotics, SCG, Synbiotic, and Vitamin D for SCORAD. Cumulative probability rankings indicated Dupilumab (96.0%), Tralokinumab (86.8%), and PEC (69.2%) as the top treatments. For EASI, Pimecrolimus, Dupilumab, and Nemolizumab were superior to Probiotics, with Pimecrolimus showing the highest efficacy (99.9%). Conclusion: Dupilumab may offer greater benefits in reducing SCORAD scores, while Pimecrolimus appears to be more effective for improving EASI. These treatments show potential as favorable options for managing pediatric atopic dermatitis. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420250650919, identifier CRD420250650919.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.