ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Limitations in the clinical translation of mesenchymal stromal cells: standardisation, heterogeneity and the recipient.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Therapeutic Potential of Stem Cell Therapy for Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Harnessing Endogenous Plasticity Rather than Reprogramming of Mature Cells Will Advance Regenerative Medicine, Cancer Treatment and Rejuvenation.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapeutic efficacy of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) has been demonstrated in a multitude of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, yet the translation of MSC therapies is limited by biological factors such as inter- and intra-donor variability in the function, differentiation capacity and proliferation rate of MSCs, as well as extrinsic factors such as the implementation of standardised reporting and characterisation guidelines. The complex relationship between MSC heterogeneity and recipient heterogeneity further contributes to the challenging interpretation of results and complicates the comparison of outcomes between studies. Efforts to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs have been made, however only a few focus on addressing heterogeneity. Aside from this, a clear understanding of the mechanism of action of MSCs and the development of appropriate functional/potency assays could aid in the standardisation of MSC therapies and provide information for the stratification of recipients. This review discusses the challenges associated with the clinical translation of MSCs and critically evaluates recent advancements in the strategies to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.