ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Induced pluripotent stem cells as platforms for engineering NK cell immunotherapies.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are transforming adoptive cell therapy by combining unlimited self-renewal, broad differentiation potential, and high amenability to genome engineering. These attributes make iPSCs a versatile source for the development of standardized immune effector cells at industrial scale, enabling a shift from patient- or donor-restricted cell products toward true off-the-shelf immunotherapies that can be improved through iterative genome engineering. iPSC-derived natural killer (iNK) cells are the most clinically advanced and exemplify the platform's advantages over conventional autologous or donor-sourced approaches. Unlike autologous therapies, which require labor-intensive and expensive personalized clinical-grade manufacturing, and are constrained by variable quality and genetic intractability of donor products, iPSC technology supports the creation of renewable, clonally defined master cell banks as uniform starting material for NK-cell therapy products. Advances in CRISPR/Cas-based editing now permit multiplex introduction of functional traits, enhanced cytokine signaling, antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, checkpoint resistance, optimized trafficking, safety switches, and increasing signal complexity, directly at the pluripotent or progenitor stages; ultimately allowing for fully-programmable iNK cells with customizable potency and persistence. Early clinical studies of iNK products validate the feasibility, safety, and therapeutic potential of this approach, but also underscore the need for continued refinement of differentiation protocols, manufacturing pipelines, and regulatory standards to ensure efficacy, genomic stability, phenotypic maturity, and long-term safety. This review outlines current breakthroughs and future directions of iNK cell therapies, emphasizing how programmable iPSC chassis platforms are enabling modular and off-the-shelf targeted immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.