Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42148702›Full record

ArticleReproduction & fertility2026

Machine learning and automation methods for the segmentation, classification and quantification of testicular tissue sections.

Adam J R Gadd, Iris Sanou, Eleanor Brain, Jill Davies, Adomas Liugaila, Kathleen Duffin, Agnes Stefansdottir, Rod T Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adam J R GaddCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8632-2363
Iris SanouReproductive Biology Laboratory, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eleanor BrainRoyal Hospital for Children & Young People, Edinburgh, UK.
Jill DaviesOxford Cell and Tissue Biobank, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Adomas LiugailaBiomedical Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0508-9585
Kathleen DuffinCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Agnes StefansdottirBiomedical Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-672X
Rod T MitchellCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-3765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphical Abstract: Abstract: Analysis of immunofluorescent images can be time-consuming and observer-dependant. We aimed to develop a standardised method for analysing immunofluorescent images of human and mouse testicular tissues using an existing software package. We used QuPath to train and apply an artificial neural network with multilayer perception (ANN-MLP) on images. We were able to automate the segmentation of cells in regions of interest (ROIs) using both StarDist (a convolution neural network) and Watershed image transformation. Segmented cells were classified using QuPath object classification system, which was successfully applied to a range of mouse and human interstitial, Sertoli and spermatogonial germ cell markers. We found that manual counting and classification of cells decoupled the relationship between tubular area and a number of SOX9+ (r 2 = 0.26, P = 0.35) and MAGE-A+ (r 2 = 0.26, P = 0.35) cells. However, automating the segmentation of ROIs and cell classification with simple macros yielded results that maintained the correlation between tubular area and number of SOX9+ (r 2 = 0.56, P = 0.03) and MAGE-A+ (r 2 = 0.93, P = 0.002) cells. In addition, we were able to export data into R/RStudio allowing for the analysis of classification-specific parameters such as mitotic index and cellular organisation in different regions of the tubule. Importantly, the time taken per image using the automated method was significantly faster (6,247 vs three seconds; P < 0.001) at segmenting tubules and quantifying cells than previous manual annotation methods. We propose the use of this method for analysis and cell quantification in testicular tissues. Lay summary: Machine learning (ML) is a type of algorithm that forms part of artificial intelligence (AI). ML is able to learn, detect and predict sequences and structures such as words in sentences or objects in images. ML combined with the ability of modern computers to process large quantities of data and perform repetitive tasks in an automated way makes it an attractive research tool. In particular, the analysis of images taken from a microscope of patient or experimental samples is one area in which ML can excel. We found that open-source software containing ML could be trained on as few as six images. Once trained, the machine learning algorithm could analyse an image in approximately one minute. The same image would take a skilled researcher nearly two hours to analyse. In addition to speed, ML was able to do this more accurately and consistently as well as being automated by a simple piece of code.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningTestisAnimalsAutomationHumansMaleMiceNeural Networks, ComputerSOX9 Transcription FactorSpermatogoniaSOX9 Transcription Factorcell quantificationgerm cellshumanmachine learningtestis

Identifiers

PMID42148702
PMCPMC13232597

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.