ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Effects of Delayed Pessary Maintenance Appointments on Patient's Symptoms and Clinical Findings During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare globally, with significant delays in elective services. This service evaluation aimed to capture the impact of delays in pessary maintenance appointments on patient's symptom experience and clinical findings.
methodsAll patients attending routine pessary maintenance appointments over a 6-month period during the COVID-19 pandemic were asked a series of questions concerning vaginal symptoms. Clinician observation of erythema and erosion were recorded. Descriptive statistics, for both total duration in situ and delay in pessary maintenance appointments, were calculated on the basis of pessary type for each symptom.
resultsOf the 208 questionnaires received, 173 were analysed and 35 excluded (incomplete data). Pessary distribution: ring (n = 99), Gellhorn (n = 52), shelf (n = 22). There was a moderate correlation with time pessary in situ and symptoms of discharge and odour in all pessaries, with a weak relationship between symptoms and delay in pessary maintenance appointments. Patients using a pessary longer than 6 months, were unlikely to report worsening symptoms related to delay in pessary maintenance appointments, with the majority reporting no symptom change. Whilst clinician findings of erythema and erosion correlated strongly with duration of pessary use, severe changes were observed when pessaries were in situ at least 11 months.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that in select patients, extending pessary maintenance appointments beyond 6 months may have little effect on patient symptoms but, beyond 10 months risks increasing the incidence of severe erythema and erosion. This can help reduce burden on appointments for both patients and providers and reduce wastage of single use resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149146What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.